Fraudsters: Kajiado Governor Joseph Ole Lenku Deconstructs Jamii Bora Proprietors

Kindly read and share to support us reach our target audiences.
  • Kajiado Governor Joseph Ole Lenku asks Senate Committee to compel a Jamii Bora/Kisaju View/ Jamii Bora Trust Housing scheme to submit official documents of the land they are developing.

  • County Government of Kajiado charged that Housing scheme which has been operating on three different names for their convenience to pay Sh260million being the land rates for the years 2013-2023.

  • Senate Roads, Transport and Housing Committee Chair Senator Karungo Thangw’a pardons Kajiado Governor Joseph Ole Lenku of Sh500,000 fines imposed over failure to appear before them

Kajiado Governor Joseph Ole Lenku termed the proprietors of Jamii Bora Housing Scheme as fraudsters for they never submitted any tittle deeds for the protracted land they sold to Kisaju estate owners

Appearing before the Senate Roads, Transport and Housing Committee chaired by Kiambu lawmaker Karungo wa Thang’wa, Governor Lenku accused the Housing project developer for changing names to evade taxation and continue to dupe Kenyans.

“Jamii Bora/Kisaju View/Jamii Bora Trust are not coming to you with clean hands. They should be compelled to provide legal documents. He who seeks equity must come with clean hands,” said Lenku.

According to Lenku, the management of the Housing scheme has been changing names and ownership over time to evade taxation and continue dupe Kenyans day by day , adding that they have also made it difficult for the county to transact or engage in meaningful settlements.

“Most developments have been undertaken without County approval and the ones sanctioned by the defunct local authority have lapsed. Developments approved by the defunct local authority need to be validated and approved afresh to continue with any further developments and redevelopments.”

Lenku told the committee that Jamii Bora is managing 2000 units  which now qualify the area to be managed by the County going by the threshold of the Urban Areas and Cities Act 2011 (revised in 2019).

He further argued that the township should be managed by the County for progressive review of development needs while recognizing an existence of private entities.

In addition, Lenku was categorical that in line with the County Governments laws, Physical and Use Planning Act and the Urban Areas and Cities Act the County shall undertake site pickings to determine existing developments on site, collect/register property owners and compel production of revised building plans.

On ownership, Lenku told the committee that the project was initiated by Jamii Bora Makao and that subsequent years have witnessed several transitions of ownership by successful management that include Kisaju Viewpark Limited and later Jamii Bora Trust.

“This transitioning has made it difficult to follow up on matters related to statutory payments and follow up on compliance issues. The land occupied has two titles: Kajiado Kisaju 58 and Kajiado 2995 registered under Jamii Bora Makao,” said Lenku.

According to the submissions of Lenku, Jamii Bora submitted a request in 2004 and made a payment of Sh2.9million for sub-division and a further Sh1.95million for building plans approvals.

“We do not have any records of the scheme plan submitted for approval since physical planning had not been devolved by then.”

Kajiado County now wants the Senate to compel Jamii Bora to allow the County to undertake site picking of the existing development, evaluate the number of units developed on site and submit subdivision scheme plan for the site.

“We have mutation plans for parcel No 2995 and a registry index map for the parcel no Kajiado/Kisaju 58 that hold two properties for Jamii Bora. The County requests the Senate to compel Jamii Bora to submit the revised scheme plan and statutory payments which they have not done to date,” said Lenku.

Lenku’s submission gave way to Senators who took issue with the developer saying that the county government should give waiver on the developer so that buyers of the units can be protected.

“The waiver should benefit all the petitioners. The proprietors are fraudsters. The County should transfer benefit to the petitioners,” said Nominated Peris Tobiko who is also the committee vice chairperson.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *