Africa stands at a defining crossroads. Across the continent, governments are being asked to do the impossible: protect their people, invest in the future, and respond to growing social needs—while shackled by a crushing debt burden.
The result is a quiet but devastating trade-off, one where debt servicing consistently wins and citizens consistently lose. If the global community is serious about the mantra of “One World, One Humanity – Solidarity for One Future,” then debt cancellation must move from rhetoric to reality.
Today, Africa’s debt crisis has reached alarming proportions. In many countries, debt has become the single largest claim on public finances, crowding out spending on health, education, social protection, and food security. Recent figures illustrate the imbalance starkly: in 2022, African countries spent roughly $90 billion servicing debt, compared to about $70 billion on healthcare. This is not just an accounting problem—it is a moral one.
The consequences are visible everywhere. Hospitals lack essential medicines and staff. Classrooms are overcrowded or abandoned altogether. Social safety nets barely exist, leaving millions vulnerable to shocks from pandemics, climate change, and economic downturns. Food insecurity continues to rise, not because Africa lacks land or labor, but because governments lack fiscal space to invest in agriculture and resilience.
READ ALSO: https://safinews.co.ke/kalonzo-musyoka-follows-closely-fred-matiangi/
The African Union’s Abuja Declaration of 2001, which committed member states to allocate at least 15 percent of national budgets to health, was a bold recognition that development begins with healthy citizens. Yet more than two decades later, most countries remain far from meeting this target. The reason is not indifference or ignorance; it is arithmetic. When debt repayments come first, social spending comes last.
Recent initiatives, such as the 2024 African Leadership Meeting, have rightly emphasized the need for “more health for the money”—greater efficiency, better targeting, and improved governance. These reforms matter. But efficiency alone cannot compensate for empty coffers. You cannot optimize what you do not have. Without addressing the debt crisis head-on, these well-meaning reforms risk remaining little more than policy aspirations.
The link between debt servicing and underfunded social sectors is direct and unforgiving. Governments forced to prioritize creditors over citizens inevitably compromise on essential services. The impacts are fourfold.
First, healthcare systems remain fragile, ill-equipped to handle pandemics or routine care. Second, education systems suffer chronic underinvestment, undermining learning outcomes and robbing future generations of opportunity. Third, social protection remains thin or nonexistent, deepening inequality and poverty. Fourth, food security initiatives are underfunded, leaving millions exposed to hunger despite the continent’s vast agricultural potential.
There are, however, glimmers of hope. Some countries have shown that debt relief—when designed well—can unlock real social gains. Malawi’s debt restructuring, for example, created fiscal space that allowed increased investment in health and education. Debt-for-nature swaps have also demonstrated promise, protecting biodiversity while redirecting resources toward sustainable development.
Yet these successes are uneven and fragile. Too often, debt relief initiatives come with stringent conditions that limit national policy space. In other cases, relief is partial or delayed, offering temporary breathing room without addressing structural vulnerabilities. Debt sustainability remains a legitimate concern, but it cannot be used as an excuse for inaction. The risk of re-indebtedness must be managed, not weaponized against meaningful relief.
What Africa needs now is a bold, coordinated approach to debt cancellation and restructuring—one that places people at the center. This means meaningful debt cancellation for highly indebted countries, innovative debt swaps explicitly tied to social sector financing, and fairer global financing architecture that prevents future crises. It also means recognizing that creditors, too, have a responsibility when lending decisions contribute to unsustainable outcomes.
Debt cancellation is not charity. It is an investment in global stability, shared prosperity, and human dignity. A continent where children are educated, communities are healthy, and people are food-secure is a continent better equipped to contribute to the global economy and address shared challenges such as climate change and pandemics.
Africa’s debt crisis is choking its development potential. Canceling that debt could help unlock it. The choice before the G20 and the wider international community is clear: continue to prioritize balance sheets—or choose solidarity and invest in people. History will remember which path was taken.